Allegations Arise: Hillary Clinton Considered Drone Strike on Julian Assange

2 months ago 306

In a startling revelation, allegations have emerged suggesting that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton once entertained the idea of utilizing a drone strike against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. These claims, if proven true, could mark a significant escalation in the ongoing feud between the U.S. government and Assange.

Reports indicate that discussions surrounding the potential drone strike occurred during Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State under the Obama administration. Sources close to the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that Clinton was allegedly irate over the publication of classified diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks, which caused a diplomatic uproar and strained relations between the United States and its allies.

Hillary Clinton Kill Julian Assange

The controversial proposal purportedly arose during a meeting in 2010, where Clinton and several top aides discussed ways to mitigate the fallout from WikiLeaks' disclosures. According to insiders, Clinton expressed frustration and reportedly asked, "Can't we just drone this guy?" The suggestion stunned those present, leaving them momentarily speechless.

While it remains unclear whether Clinton's proposal was made in earnest or as a rhetorical expression of frustration, the mere mention of employing lethal force against Assange underscores the gravity of the situation. The WikiLeaks founder, known for his role in publishing sensitive government documents, has been a thorn in the side of numerous governments worldwide, including the United States.

Assange, who sought refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for seven years to avoid extradition to the United States, has faced intense scrutiny and legal challenges. In April 2019, he was forcibly removed from the embassy and arrested by British authorities. Since then, he has been embroiled in a protracted legal battle against extradition to the United States, where he faces espionage charges related to the publication of classified information.

The emergence of these allegations against Clinton adds another layer of complexity to Assange's already tumultuous legal saga. Critics argue that such discussions, even if not acted upon, raise serious questions about the ethics and legality of targeting journalists and whistleblowers. Advocates for press freedom have condemned any notion of using lethal force against individuals engaged in journalistic activities, emphasizing the need to protect the principles of a free press.

In response to inquiries about the allegations, representatives for Hillary Clinton have neither confirmed nor denied the veracity of the claims. However, they have reiterated Clinton's longstanding position on Assange, characterizing him as a threat to national security due to his role in disseminating classified information.

As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether further evidence will surface to corroborate these allegations. Regardless, the specter of a high-level discussion regarding the use of a drone strike against Assange serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by whistleblowers and the delicate balance between national security and press freedom.